[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/feed/attachments_base.php on line 95: Undefined array key 23771
RC-Hangout Hang with your RC family 2016-10-18T07:06:10 https://www.rc-hangout.com/app.php/feed/topic/1711 2016-10-18T07:06:10 2016-10-18T07:06:10 https://www.rc-hangout.com/viewtopic.php?t=1711&p=26623#p26623 <![CDATA[Re: 4 Engine Scratch built Bomber]]> Statistics: Posted by Harper88 — Tue Oct 18, 2016 7:06 am


]]>
2016-04-19T20:43:33 2016-04-19T20:43:33 https://www.rc-hangout.com/viewtopic.php?t=1711&p=24381#p24381 <![CDATA[Re: 4 Engine Scratch built Bomber]]> Sweet plane Gerald

Statistics: Posted by danhampson — Tue Apr 19, 2016 8:43 pm


]]>
2016-04-14T20:05:52 2016-04-14T20:05:52 https://www.rc-hangout.com/viewtopic.php?t=1711&p=24276#p24276 <![CDATA[Re: 4 Engine Scratch built Bomber]]>
You can't have a bomber that doesn't drop bombs. :D

Statistics: Posted by Stambo — Thu Apr 14, 2016 8:05 pm


]]>
2016-04-14T02:04:28 2016-04-14T02:04:28 https://www.rc-hangout.com/viewtopic.php?t=1711&p=24270#p24270 <![CDATA[Re-Maiden of the 4 Engine Bomber]]> https://youtu.be/qUqEM7SUosw

Statistics: Posted by Vipertech13 — Thu Apr 14, 2016 2:04 am


]]>
2016-04-02T19:38:35 2016-04-02T19:38:35 https://www.rc-hangout.com/viewtopic.php?t=1711&p=24099#p24099 <![CDATA[Re: 4 Engine Scratch built Bomber]]> Statistics: Posted by Derek — Sat Apr 02, 2016 7:38 pm


]]>
2016-04-02T18:13:28 2016-04-02T18:13:28 https://www.rc-hangout.com/viewtopic.php?t=1711&p=24095#p24095 <![CDATA[Re: 4 Engine Scratch built Bomber]]> soon:)

Statistics: Posted by Graham Lawrie — Sat Apr 02, 2016 6:13 pm


]]>
2016-04-02T15:16:41 2016-04-02T15:16:41 https://www.rc-hangout.com/viewtopic.php?t=1711&p=24093#p24093 <![CDATA[Re: 4 Engine Scratch built Bomber]]> Repairs have been made and a recalculation of the CG has yielded a location difference of 2" more forward than what I initially flew it with! Yikes!
That was my mistake in the calculation of the CG, lesson learned!
I have opted for the 3 blade props to look more classic bomber style and slightly more ground clearance, trade off being a slight drop in maximum thrust of less than a 1/4 lbs. but draws 5 amps less and the thrust has more of an even curve. Where the 2 blade props would punch 3 lbs static at full throttle the thrust would drop quickly to 2.4 lbs. the 3 blade props punch 2.8 lbs but only drop to 2.6 lbs and hold there for a long time. Again this is my not so scientific static testing using a scale against the wall and the plane's nose up against it.
I have relocated the landing gear to accommodate the more forward CG point to keep from nosing over! We have been there haven't we Derek! LOL
Painting is underway as of now,
front side close
bomer front
bomber top
The battery and wire compartment with my esc to motor color connection chart.
bomber hatch
wiring diagram
And of course my switch and volt meter.
side with vm
Would love to be re-maidening it this weekend but it's raining this morning and wind forecast is 10 to 20 today and tomorrow with 50 mph gust tomorrow.
GROUNDED!

Statistics: Posted by Vipertech13 — Sat Apr 02, 2016 3:16 pm


]]>
2016-03-14T04:51:10 2016-03-14T04:51:10 https://www.rc-hangout.com/viewtopic.php?t=1711&p=23773#p23773 <![CDATA[Re: 4 Engine Scratch built Bomber]]> Statistics: Posted by cml001 — Mon Mar 14, 2016 4:51 am


]]>
2016-03-14T04:03:54 2016-03-14T04:03:54 https://www.rc-hangout.com/viewtopic.php?t=1711&p=23771#p23771 <![CDATA[Re: 4 Engine Scratch built Bomber]]> Statistics: Posted by pvolcko — Mon Mar 14, 2016 4:03 am


]]>
2016-03-14T00:06:18 2016-03-14T00:06:18 https://www.rc-hangout.com/viewtopic.php?t=1711&p=23760#p23760 <![CDATA[Re: 4 Engine Scratch built Bomber]]> Statistics: Posted by Derek — Mon Mar 14, 2016 12:06 am


]]>
2016-03-13T15:18:04 2016-03-13T15:18:04 https://www.rc-hangout.com/viewtopic.php?t=1711&p=23757#p23757 <![CDATA[Re: 4 Engine Scratch built Bomber]]>

Statistics: Posted by Lee — Sun Mar 13, 2016 3:18 pm


]]>
2016-03-12T19:11:07 2016-03-12T19:11:07 https://www.rc-hangout.com/viewtopic.php?t=1711&p=23754#p23754 <![CDATA[Re: 4 Engine Scratch built Bomber]]> Statistics: Posted by Graham Lawrie — Sat Mar 12, 2016 7:11 pm


]]>
2016-04-02T21:19:18 2016-03-12T19:07:43 https://www.rc-hangout.com/viewtopic.php?t=1711&p=23752#p23752 <![CDATA[4 Engine Scratch built Bomber]]> Here is what I drafted up in windows paint.
bomber side LG.png
horz and tail.png
bomber.png
I started to built this monster and all I can say is more motors mean more wire, more weight, more headaches. I mounted the esc's in a vertical rack system to make it easy to connect the motor wires coming from the wing access port.
esc compartment.jpg
motor wires.jpg
To keep the Rx working I incorporated a UBEC running off a separate 1000mAh LiPo that has an external switch and voltmeter.
electronics side.jpg
The motors are counter rotating of course and run off 2 separate 2200mAh batteries the outboard engines are together and the inboard are together that way if I have a failure of a battery or esc I don't lose all or one side of the plane. From this top view you can see the 2 square holes for the batteries.
full plane.jpg
Some of the specs.
58" wingspan, wing cord tapers from 10" to 5" center to tip.
Fuse length 40".
(4) 2822 1100Kv motors swinging 7x5 props,
(4)20 amp esc's with bec circuit disconnected
(6)10 gram servos, 2 aileron, 2 flaps, 1 elevator and 1 rudder.
3 batteries (2) 2200 3s, (1) 1000 3s (1) UBEC 5 volt 3 Amp output
Aluminium landing gear with 2.75" dia. tires Steerable tail wheel
All up weight is 3.48 lbs
The engines are producing 3.0 Lbs of static thrust according to my redneck thrust tester.
thrust test.jpg
Bottom view with yard stick for size reference.
IMG_20160223_000052 (1024x768).jpg
Side view
IMG_20160223_000424 (1024x768).jpg
Well that's quite a lot to take in! I have flow a maiden flight and it was not too good! Major miscalculation on the CG and too much control surface throw and that might have been exaggerated by the tail heavy CG.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0WZfytUbMmw
More work to do so Bomber 2.0 soon

Statistics: Posted by Vipertech13 — Sat Mar 12, 2016 7:07 pm


]]>